AI-generated recommendations and examples are illustrative, not verified measurements. Accuracy, model availability, benchmark freshness, cost savings and improved results are not guaranteed. Verify outputs independently before relying on them.

GetResult

Result Synthesis

Security Level 1

Consolidate multiple answers into one optimal result. Combine different perspectives - multiple opinions become one coherent solution!

SindByte tool execution flow: voice command, AI parse, execute, validate, result

Why This Tool Stands Out

Technical Details

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
responsesArrayYesList of answers to consolidate
goalStringYesThe desired outcome/quality criterion
refinement_roundsIntegerNoNumber of refinement rounds (default: 2)
conflict_resolutionStringNo"conservative", "aggressive", "balanced" (default: balanced)

Request Example

{
  "tool": "GetResult",
  "params": {
    "responses": [
      "GPT-4: The solution requires a microservices approach with an API gateway.",
      "Claude: A monolithic architecture with a modular structure is better.",
      "Gemini: Hybrid approach with a core monolith and microservices for new features."
    ],
    "goal": "Recommendation for modernizing the architecture of a legacy system",
    "refinement_rounds": 3,
    "conflict_resolution": "balanced"
  }
}

Response Example

{
  "status": "success",
  "synthesis": {
    "consolidated_result": "A gradual transition is recommended: Start with a modular monolith structure for the legacy core and decouple new features as microservices. This minimizes risk during the migration and enables gradual modernization.",
    "key_points": [
      "Modular monolith for stable legacy components",
      "Microservices only for new, independent features",
      "API gateway as the central interface",
      "Gradual migration instead of big bang"
    ],
    "sources_contributions": {
      "GPT-4": "Microservices advantages and API gateway",
      "Claude": "Monolith stability and migration risks",
      "Gemini": "Hybrid transition approach"
    },
    "conflicts_resolved": [
      {
        "conflict": "Microservices vs. Monolith",
        "resolution": "Context-dependent combination of both approaches"
      }
    ],
    "confidence": 0.88,
    "refinement_history": [
      "Round 1: Grouping similar points",
      "Round 2: Conflict analysis and resolution",
      "Round 3: Final structuring and wording"
    ]
  }
}

Example Usage

Illustrative HTTP pseudocode only: example.invalid is a placeholder, not a documented service endpoint. Do not send real credentials. Confirm the local MCP transport and tool schema for your installed version.

# GetResult API call
import requests

responses = [
    "Model A recommends: Kubernetes for orchestration",
    "Model B recommends: Docker Compose for simplicity",
    "Model C recommends: Serverless for cost efficiency"
]

response = requests.post(
    "https://api.example.invalid/iqtools/getresult",
    headers={"Authorization": "Bearer EXAMPLE_KEY_DO_NOT_USE"},
    json={
        "responses": responses,
        "goal": "Best deployment strategy for a startup",
        "refinement_rounds": 2
    }
)

result = response.json()
print(result["synthesis"]["consolidated_result"])

Typical Usage Examples

Perfect for

Time Savings Overview

No measured time-saving or performance figures are available here. Results depend on the task and environment.

Related Tools

Merge Multiple Perspectives?

Use GetResult for the optimal synthesis of different answers and opinions.

Download Now
Back to IQTools